About

About the Author

I am an elder, husband, father, and theological researcher with a deep love for Scripture and a particular interest in the doctrines of salvation and the character of God.

This website began as a personal study system and a place for me to organize and preserve my notes as I worked through theological questions. Over time, I realized that many of those studies might also help others who are wrestling with soteriology, especially the claims of Calvinism and the alternatives to it.

My goal for this website is to study carefully, think biblically, and pursue the truth wherever it leads about the doctrine of soteriology.

Why This Site Exists

Soteriology - the study of salvation - is one of the most important secondary issues in the Christian faith. I call it secondary because I do not believe that holding an incorrect view of soteriology automatically removes someone from salvation. I regard faithful Christians who disagree with me on this subject as brothers and sisters in Christ.

At the same time, I believe the subject deserves critical examination.

Predestination, and Calvinism in general, is increasingly being discussed outside Christian circles and in the secular world, and it is rarely presented in a favorable light.[1] When predestination is defined as God choosing who and who will not be saved before the foundation of the world - along with the accompanying doctrines of reprobation and the reduction of human choice to an ordained response - souls are at stake.

These teachings have the potential to hinder evangelism, create stumbling blocks for those who hear the gospel, and influence people within the faith who are already struggling with doubt. Even when people do not leave Christianity because of these doctrines, they may come away with a distorted view of the heart and character of God.

For that reason, this site exists to confront Calvinist theology as a system and to examine its specific doctrines and arguments. I will not avoid difficult conclusions or soften my criticisms simply to make them more comfortable. But my purpose is not to attack Calvinists as people. I want to vigorously dismantle arguments I believe are false while loving the people who hold them.

My Theological Journey

Many years ago, my church offered a class on soteriology. I eagerly enrolled, and I was the youngest person in the class by far. During one session, our instructor presented his strongest arguments for both Arminianism and Calvinism. As part of his teaching style, he did not tell us which position he held. He wanted us to examine the Scriptures and reach our own conclusions.

I remember feeling genuinely torn. Both positions appeared to have biblical support. Calvinism seemed to give a powerful account of God's sovereignty, while Arminianism seemed to better preserve God's love and human responsibility. My heart was drawn toward the view that better reflected the character of God as I saw presented in the Word, but my reasoning often found Calvinism to be the more logically consistent of the two systems as they were presented.

I was drawn toward the Arminianism conclusions, but I could not yet explain clearly why Calvinism was wrong. I also began to wonder how the Word of God could contain apparently conflicting statements about such a foundational subject.

It wasn't until much later that I came to believe that I had been presented with a false dichotomy. Calvinism and Arminianism are not the only available frameworks for understanding salvation. Although I believe that Arminianism finds itself closer to the truth in their conclusions in important ways, I believe it still contains weaknesses that can make Calvinism appear to be the stronger logical option - particularly when those are the only two choices being considered.

I will go so far to say that the flaws of Armenian theology may be a leading cause that Calvinism has gained such popularity. The combination of Armenian flaws and this false dichotomy has undoubtedly swayed many to align with the Calvinist camp, if only out of an act of desperation. 

Discovering a third option was a profound relief. I found a view of salvation that I believe better accounts for God's character, affirms both divine provision and human responsibility, and offers a coherent reading of the biblical witness.

What Is Provisionism?

This view is often called Provisionism or traditionalism. In simple terms, Provisionism emphasizes God's provision of salvation, the genuine availability of the gospel, and humanity's responsibility to respond.

Provisionism is not merely a compromise between Calvinism and Arminianism, nor is it an attempt to occupy a safe middle ground. It begins with what God has revealed about Himself and seeks to understand salvation in a way that preserves His goodness, justice, love, and sincerity.

When we are lost in sin, God provides a way of reconciliation through Christ. When we cannot make ourselves righteous, God provides salvation. When we need to hear the gospel, God provides a genuine message of grace and calls people to respond.

I believe this framework offers a better account of God's character and brings the relevant biblical passages together without requiring us to treat central truths as competing against one another.

The studies on this site explore these claims in greater detail. I encourage you to approach them with both seriousness and fairness. Do not accept an argument merely because it supports your existing position, but do not reject it merely because it challenges you.

My Promise

I want every Calvinist argument addressed on this site to be presented in its strongest form. I want to steel-man the opposing position and to represent the opposing views accurately and fairly.

The truth has nothing to fear from careful examination. If an argument is sound, it will remain standing after scrutiny. If it is not sound, we should be willing to discover that.

I also want to remain open to correction. I have always believed that I must follow the Word of God whether or not it agrees with what I want to believe. If you believe that I am wrong in a statement, argument, interpretation, or conclusion, I invite you to challenge me and explain why through appeal to Scripture, careful reasoning, and sound interpretation.

I will not hold back my punches, but I will also never pull back the hand of fellowship. I will attack and dismantle arguments I believe are false while loving the people who hold them.

If the Bible teaches Calvinism, then we should all be Calvinists. If it does not, then none of us should be Calvinists. So let us reason together as we study the character of God as He has revealed Himself in His Word.

And if you manage to convince me that Calvinism or Arminianism is true, I suppose I will need to build a new website. But until then, chances are that I will remain a Provisionist - unless maybe God predestines me otherwise. :)